The AI Value Chain: Research and Policy Priorities

Technical Advances, Emerging Risks, and Opportunities

Neil D. Lawrence

Bennett Institute for Public Policy & OECD Conference, St. Catharine’s College, Cambridge

Introduction: The AI Value Chain and Information Flows

Artificial General Vehicle

Locked-In Intelligence: The Human Condition

  • Humans have locked-in intelligence
  • Limited by our physical embodiment
  • Our communication abilities constrain us

The Communication Bandwidth Disparity

  • Human vs. machine: disparity in communication rates
  • Digital systems process information orders of magnitude faster than humans
  • This disparity creates structural power imbalances

Bandwidth vs Complexity

bits/min \(100 \times 10^{-9}\) \(2,000\) \(600 \times 10^9\)

Changing Flows of Information

New Flow of Information

Evolved Relationship

Evolved Relationship

  • UK policy responses:
    • Online Safety Bill
    • Digital Markets, Competition and Consumer Act

Human Analogue Machines and Information Flow

  • AI systems as Human Analogue Machines (HAMs)
  • From humans to HAMs to humans
  • Exponentially increases power differentials

HAM

Trustworthiness, Intelligent Accountability, and the AI Value Chain

  • Digital systems can’t encode
  • Digital systems don’t have “intelligent accountability”
  • Trustworthiness precedes trust

A Question of Trust

A Question of Trust

Again Univesities are to treat each applicant fairly on the basis of ability and promise, but they are supposed also to admit a socially more representative intake.

There’s no guarantee that the process meets the target.

Onora O’Neill A Question of Trust: Called to Account Reith Lectures 2002 O’Neill (2002)]

  • Public dialogue reveals citizen priorities
  • Trustworthiness requires public engagement
  • Technical governance needs democratic legitimacy

Public Dialogue on AI in Public Services

  • September 2024 convened public dialogues.
  • Perspectives on AI in priority policy agendas.

“I think a lot of the ideas need to be about AI being like a co-pilot to someone. I think it has to be that. So not taking the human away.”

Public Participant, Liverpool pg 15 ai@cam and Hopkins Van Mil (2024)

Innovation Models: From Productivity to Attention

The Traditional Productivity Flywheel

  • Traditional innovation focused on productivity gains
  • Clear connection between macro interventions and micro incentives
  • Created broadly shared prosperity in 20th century

Productivity Flywheel

New Productivity Paradox

  • Current productivity flywheel relies on measurement to translate innovation into productivity.
  • Without measurement how does the wheel spin?

The Attention Reinvestment Cycle

  • Productivity cycle relies on financial signals
  • Disconnection between macro interventions and micro incentives
  • Leads to different power dynamics and distribution of benefits

The Attention Reinvestment Cycle

  • AI creates time savings for professionals
  • Freed attention reinvested in knowledge sharing
  • Organic growth through professional networks

Benefits of Organic Growth

  • Solutions spread through peer-to-peer learning
  • Frontline workers become technology champions
  • Sustainable, scalable implementation

Attention Reinvestment Cycle

Policy Implications for the AI Value Chain

  • Data flows and governance as central policy concerns
  • Need for new institutional models to address power imbalances
  • Focus on bridging macro interventions to micro incentives

Supply Chain of Ideas

  • Ideas flow from creation to application like physical supply chains
  • Parallels with traditional economic supply chain management
  • Particularly relevant for IT and AI solutions

Supply Chain of Ideas

  • Current imbalance between supply and demand sides
    • Mismatch between macroeconomic interventions and microeconomic need
  • Over-Focus on solutionism
    • technologies/companies
  • Under-focus on real-world needs … disconnect between government and citizens … disconnect between companies and customers

Supply Chain of Ideas

  • Need to map idea problems demand to idea supply
  • Need to understand … problems (demand) … current “stock” of solutions (supply)
  • Requires active management of idea resources
  • Shape supply to meet demand

Research and Policy Priorities

  • How to connect macro policy to micro incentives
  • Institutional innovations for data governance
  • Methods for effective public participation in AI governance

Conclusion: Serving People, Science and Society

  • AI value chain creates new power dynamics and challenges
  • Need to bridge between macro policy and micro incentives
  • Public engagement is essential for legitimate governance

Thanks!

  • book: The Atomic Human
  • twitter: @lawrennd
  • The Atomic Human pages Bauby, Jean Dominique 9–11, 18, 90, 99-101, 133, 186, 212–218, 234, 240, 251–257, 318, 368–369 , Human evolution rates 98-99, Psychological representation of Ecologies 323-327, human-analogue machine (HAMs) 343-347, 359-359, 365-368, O’Neill, Baroness Onora: ‘A question of trust’ lecture series (2002) 352, 363.
  • newspaper: Guardian Profile Page
  • blog: http://inverseprobability.com

References

ai@cam, Hopkins Van Mil, 2024. AI and the Missions for Government: Insights from a public dialogue. University of Cambridge.
O’Neill, O., 2002. A question of trust. Cambridge University Press.
Scally, A., 2016. Mutation rates and the evolution of germline structure. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 371. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0137