Technical Advances, Emerging Risks, and Opportunities
Bennett Institute for Public Policy & OECD Conference, St. Catharine’s College, Cambridge
![]() |
|||
bits/min | \(100 \times 10^{-9}\) | \(2,000\) | \(600 \times 10^9\) |
Again Univesities are to treat each applicant fairly on the basis of ability and promise, but they are supposed also to admit a socially more representative intake.
There’s no guarantee that the process meets the target.
Onora O’Neill A Question of Trust: Called to Account Reith Lectures 2002 O’Neill (2002)]
“I think a lot of the ideas need to be about AI being like a co-pilot to someone. I think it has to be that. So not taking the human away.”
Public Participant, Liverpool pg 15 ai@cam and Hopkins Van Mil (2024)
Key aspirations include:
“My wife [an NHS nurse] says that the paperwork side takes longer than the actual care.”
Public Participant, Liverpool pg 9 ai@cam and Hopkins Van Mil (2024)
“I wouldn’t just want to rely on the technology for something big like that, because obviously it’s a lifechanging situation.”
Public Participant, Cambridge pg 10 ai@cam and Hopkins Van Mil (2024)
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1705.02245.pdf Data Readiness Levels (Lawrence, 2017)
|
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
|
book: The Atomic Human
twitter: @lawrennd
The Atomic Human pages Bauby, Jean Dominique 9–11, 18, 90, 99-101, 133, 186, 212–218, 234, 240, 251–257, 318, 368–369 , Human evolution rates 98-99, Psychological representation of Ecologies 323-327, human-analogue machine (HAMs) 343-347, 359-359, 365-368, O’Neill, Baroness Onora: ‘A question of trust’ lecture series (2002) 352, 363, Horizon scandal 371.
newspaper: Guardian Profile Page
blog posts: